The ' immigration has a different impact

Many Americans are concerned about the ' social and economic impact of immigration. large number of immigrants entering the United States each year, and observers wonder how these people affect the availability of jobs, the cost of public services, and if their region or neighborhood is becoming overcrowded. discussion on the ' immigration at national level are often on the fact that federal policies on hospitalizations are sufficient and appropriate. But when it comes to immigration, State and local level, which are often concerned about the impact of immigration ' ' on local economies and Governments. In fact, while national studies generally find that immigrants pay more in federal taxes than their use in federally funded services, the opposite may be true at the local level, where immigrants can be users of the network of services as they tend to have children in relatively expensive K -12 schools.

All this raises the question whether particular States and locals are always too " " or " too few " immigrants. There are two ways to consider this. There were a large number of immigrants, and a different set of States where the ' immigration is a major factor in population growth. States with a large number of immigrants are the so-called " gateway " States: California, New York, Texas, Florida, Illinois and New Jersey. Most people strongly associate these States with the ' immigration. The States where the ' immigration is a major part of population growth are a different set and include a large slice of Midwestern States such as Nebraska, Kansas, Ohio and Pennsylvania, which would not normally be considered the focal points of immigration. In the latter States, the number of immigrants may be relatively small, but they may have a significant impact due to low growth rates among the native population.

Issues with ' arrival of a large number of immigrants are well known: school districts may be unprepared, police and firefighters, you may need to learn to communicate with new populations, and bilingualism can become important. But the problems associated with the question whether the ' immigration is a part of large or small population growth are less discussed.

rk, Texas, Florida, Illinois, and New Jersey. Most people strongly associate these States with the ' immigration. The States where the ' immigration is a major part of population growth are a different set and include a large slice of Midwestern States such as Nebraska, Kansas, Ohio and Pennsylvania, which would not normally be considered the focal points of immigration. In the latter States, the number of immigrants may be relatively small, but they may have a significant impact due to low growth rates among the native population.

Issues with ' arrival of a large number of immigrants are well known: school districts may be unprepared, police and firefighters, you may need to learn to communicate with new populations, and bilingualism can become important. But the problems associated with the question whether the ' immigration is a part of large or small population growth are less discussed.

Consider the economic role played by immigrants as workers. In the factories of Chicago, who is losing the native population, immigrants are more than one in four workers, and without the presence of those factories may have to move elsewhere to find workers needed. In Atlanta, Georgia, a city whose natives are streaming from places like New York and Philadelphia, the number of jobs in the services sector has multiplied in recent years, and immigrants are an important part of the work force that is behind this expansion. In addition, the States with a low growth of the native population, but the rapid growth of immigrants can expect greater linguistic and cultural changes of States in which these social changes are diluted, because many natives are moving into

Immigrants who move in a region may or may not cause native Americans to leave the area. Ultimately the question can be of type chicken-or-the-egg: are natives to leave a space, because it is not desirable, while immigrants are moving in because they have different expectations? &Quot; immigrants or push out native ", who flee in the face of competition of newcomers? Researchers debate whether this type of mechanism of push-and-pull explains why the natives have left many metropolitan areas where there is growth of immigrants.

Shredder and identity theft

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

How to deal with difficult people: part 1-The sociopath

Twenty-eight old Sandra is a beautiful, successful young professional who is in relationship with one of 48 years beautiful, smooth, successful lawyer who said he was divorced. He was not.

She has forgiven her story believing that he was emotionally " " divorced (but still lived with his wife and she was not aware of being emotionally divorced " ") later, Sandra has left him after he abused her physically.

Two weeks after he took a ' the other woman on holiday with him and his sons, who purchased the property together. Decided to dump this woman. Subsequently, he literally cried and begged him to return to Sandra. She has done. Sandra feels angry questions now and why. After all, she complains, " he has been so well in the last two weeks ".

Sandra has every right to feel the feelings of anger-without guilt-because she is in the grip of a sociopath.

What is a sociopath?

We normally think of a " " as a sociopathic criminal who often ends up in prison. But, according to Dr. Marla Stout who wrote " The sociopath Next Door ", Sociopaths are often non-criminals who at first glance seem normal and well-functioning.

Inside or outside the criminal justice system, the sociopath:

* Has little or no consciousness, no ability to feel shame, guilt or remorse.

* Has a kind of glow or charisma that makes them more attractive and interesting to other people around them. Often are more spontaneous, more intense, complex or even sexier than everyone around them.

Basically, Sociopaths are different because they cannot love. Sociopaths soon learn to show emotion, but underneath are indifferent to the suffering of others '. Lack of normal feelings of empathy towards others.

Often live to dominate and thrill of winning.

If it is in relationship with a person like this, the number one challenge is to protect yourself from them.

Five survival tips

The suggestions that follow are based on the recommendations of Dr. Stout, as well as our experience with students management of anger in the grip of such a person:

Tip # 1 Accepts Bitter Pill

The first Council includes bitter pill to accept that some people literally have no consciousness, and that these people often do not resemble Charles Manson or a Ferengi bartender. They seem to like us. Sandra's boyfriend is a pillar of the community with an excellent professional reputation.

Hint # 2-Practical Rule of Three

When considering a new relationship of any nature, the rule of the three practice regarding claims and promises of a person does, and the responsibilities that he or she has.

alive to dominate and thrill of winning.

If it is in relationship with a person like this, the number one challenge is to protect yourself from them.

Five survival tips

The suggestions that follow are based on the recommendations of Dr. Stout, as well as our experience with students management of anger in the grip of such a person:

Tip # 1 Accepts Bitter Pill

The first Council includes bitter pill to accept that some people literally have no consciousness, and that these people often do not resemble Charles Manson or a Ferengi bartender. They seem to like us. Sandra's boyfriend is a pillar of the community with an excellent professional reputation.

Hint # 2-Practical Rule of Three

When considering a new relationship of any nature, the rule of the three practice regarding claims and promises of a person does, and the responsibilities that he or she has.

* A lie, a promise unfulfilled, or a single overlooked responsibility may be a misunderstanding, however.

* Two may entail a serious mistake.

* But says three lies you're dealing with a liar, and l ' deception is the mainstay of unconscious behavior.

Do not give your money, your work, your secrets, or your affection for a three-timer. Your gifts of value will be wasted.

Tip # 3-Flattery Suspect.

The compliments are nice, especially when they are sincere. In contrast, the ' flattery is extreme, and appeals to our ego so unrealistic. Is the material of counterfeit, and charm almost always involves an intent to manipulate. Manipulation through the ' sometimes flattery is harmless and sometimes sinister. Peek over your ego massaged and remember to suspect flattery.

Tip # 4-do not participate in the game.

Intrigue is the tool of a sociopath. Resist the temptation to compete with a seductive sociopath, outwit him, don't psychoanalyze me, or even jokes with him.

In addition to yourself to his level, you could be yourself distract from what is really important, which is to protect themselves.

Hint # 5-avoid contact

The best way to protect yourself from a sociopath is to avoid him, to refuse any type of contact or communication. This is not as easy as Sociopaths tend to change things and make you feel guilty, ashamed, or inadequate. Often this makes you want to try even more to make their pleasure and get their approval.

To keep a straight to the head and resist the temptation: it is better to avoid them altogether.

© 2005 Dr. Tony Fiore all rights reserved.

The roots of poverty

Remedy only superficial manifestations of deeper underlying problems of extreme poverty will never end poverty itself. At best, this approach temporarily relieve the urgent problems; at worst, exacerbate or create them in the long term problems of trade-offs. If we are to eradicate poverty, we must look to its roots and apply sustainable, pragmatic solutions.

There are many popular misconceptions about underdeveloped countries that prevent both politicians and private citizens to seriously consider solutions. Some people think that the least developed countries (LDCs) are poor as the result of laziness, mismanagement, and corruption. While corruption and mismanagement have a role in the crime of hijacking inefficient and aid funds, which certainly does not make it impossible to conduct actions for the development of success-unless, of course, we use the corrupt regimes as a justification for not giving help to all.

But what are some of the common root causes of poverty? Each of the following roots of poverty can be eliminated through development projects, when the participation of the Government to bypass or to develop mutual responsibility agreements with Governments to ensure the best results for the components of the program:

L ' geographic isolation:

The ' actually geographically isolation occurs at two levels: 1) to ' within regions and continents, and all internal ' 2). The first type of geographic isolation generally includes countries that are landlocked hundreds of kilometres away from the nearest port. These countries end up paying excessive fees and charges for freight goods import and export. L ' other type of insulation-which occurs at ' within countries-generally includes villages that are separated from the rest of the country due to lack of infrastructure. These villages typically lack electricity, adequate food markets and adequate sources of clean water.

Inadequate access to medical clinics:

Most citizens lack of access to third world medical clinics and medical advice. This is generally because the Governments in the less developed countries do not have enough resources to sponsor enough medical programs. Many LDCs also lack medical professionals due to underfunded education systems. When people cannot visit clinics regularly, dont get the advice they need to prevent disease and often end up unable to easily treatable diseases and parasites such as worms.

les away from the nearest port. These countries end up paying excessive fees and charges for freight goods import and export. L ' other type of insulation-which occurs at ' within countries-generally includes villages that are separated from the rest of the country due to lack of infrastructure. These villages typically lack electricity, adequate food markets and adequate sources of clean water.

Inadequate access to medical clinics:

Most citizens lack of access to third world medical clinics and medical advice. This is generally because the Governments in the less developed countries do not have enough resources to sponsor enough medical programs. Many LDCs also lack medical professionals due to underfunded education systems. When people cannot visit clinics regularly, dont get the advice they need to prevent disease and often end up unable to easily treatable diseases and parasites such as worms.

Underfunded Education:

Many citizens of the third world, including the lack of access to the ' statement. Since Governments in least developed countries do not have the funds to provide an educational system for all students, who often create unreasonably strict standardized test systems to ensure students graduate, and even when they do pass the test, are often detained because it simply does not exist enough resources to sustain them. Without l ' ' access to basic education and vocational training, the new generations in the less developed countries are severely limited in both choices and the ability to contribute to the development of the country.

Insufficient access to nutritious food:

Much of the third world does not have the money and resources to grow or eating a nutritious diet-and instead must be fulfilled at a meal each day of farinaceous foods and local vegetables. This leads to severe malnutrition in children and adults, the cycle of malnutrition-often fatal infection in infants and young children, high incidence of diabetes in adults. Many people-particularly in some geographical areas-lack even the means to cook meals. This causes those affected to choose between hunger and food-borne diseases.

The clones have a ' soul?

The future of artificial intelligence

There are many controversy today over the cloning of human beings. Scientists have successfully cloned sheep and other animals and can only be a matter of time before having to walk, speak replicas of ourselves. I'm not always in discussion whether it is right or wrong, this will be a debate that is raging for a long time to come. Science and religion have always been at loggerheads with other '. There are no right or wrong wars and many are caused by strong convictions that are based on the vision of the world's ego '. The ' only truth is the truth of the spirit, not only stand-alone ego '.

The issue here is going to be a clone has a ' soul?

I asked this question recently about a spiritual forum and the opinions of some very respected spiritual people were rather mixed. I concluded that all depends on how you define a ' soul and that we think we are. It is probing deep into the issues and many philosophers of the past have created a variety of answers, but the ' humanity as a whole is not deposited on any reply to date.

So what is the answer. Lets look at the future and take a scenario:

A person with the name of Will has fifty years and lives as an atheist. Will has undergone many cosmetic surgeries to vanity. Does the desire to have a ' soul? Sure, right? He cannot recognize God, but that doesn't mean that God doesn't exist. Atheists may not know if they have a ' soul, that doesn't mean that I don't have one.

DED that it all depends on how you define a ' soul and that we think we are. It is probing deep into the issues and many philosophers of the past have created a variety of answers, but the ' humanity as a whole is not deposited on any reply to date.

So what is the answer. Lets look at the future and take a scenario:

A person with the name of Will has fifty years and lives as an atheist. Will has undergone many cosmetic surgeries to vanity. Does the desire to have a ' soul? Sure, right? He cannot recognize God, but that doesn't mean that God doesn't exist. Atheists may not know if they have a ' soul, that doesn't mean that I don't have one.

Now Will is very rich and decides that he'd like a clone of himself so his image is left behind after he dies. The clone is made and is physically identical to how it looked when he was young-all natural without cosmetic surgery. Clone hard studies, grows very religious and becomes a priest. The Minister does not have a ' soul? The will of God deny the Minister? Who is the cast the first stone? Is the " " will of God, the same that " will " clone?

What about the ' progress with microchips? Very soon we'll have robots able to think for themselves. Maybe solar-powered, or can also be powered by inhalation of oxygen. Science fiction becoming science fact. Androids may well look just like humans, but that is the artificial life and a machine will not have a ' soul-or will it? Maybe the ' artificial man will be able to produce human beings " " real flesh and blood who are genetically modified to develop a disease or infectious germs port may well be the machines become more intelligent human beings and we are governed by them. extreme thoughts maybe, but all that now seems unlikely, it is very possible in the future.

' does not have a soul? The will of God deny the Minister? Who is the cast the first stone? Is the " " will of God, the same that " will " clone?

What about the ' progress with microchips? Very soon we'll have robots able to think for themselves. Maybe solar-powered, or can also be powered by inhalation of oxygen. Science fiction becoming science fact. Androids may well look just like humans, but that is the artificial life and a machine will not have a ' soul-or will it? Maybe the ' artificial man will be able to produce human beings " " real flesh and blood who are genetically modified to develop a disease or infectious germs port may well be the machines become more intelligent human beings and we are governed by them. extreme thoughts maybe, but all that now seems unlikely, it is very possible in the future.

Now more than ever, people need to understand who they are and why they exist. If we spend life without having idea of who we truly are, we will get more and more lost in high-tech revolution. We need a solid base to build our lives on.

All life contains a ' soul, and even a clone will have a soul once the breath of life is infused into the body. We will never be able to know who was born and that is a clone. Spirit is in all her life and those who want to think human beings have an exclusive contract with spirit try anger and hatred towards a cloned human being, if they can distinguish one from a human created nature. Many people will say a clone has no soul, therefore, is not truly human.

Many people think they are superior to a dog or a cat. Many people believe animals do not have a ' soul. All this blind " " dogma was programmed in humans for thousands of years. This is why most people can't be happy. They must guard their possessions and many humans believe to possess God only, from all other species of life. Some fundamentalist fanatics also get to think the other humans who are not of their system of beliefs, are not in the field of God at all. Many different tribes entangled in limitations of thought aligned into divisions of the blind of ' I think and so much time wasted, worrying and hate others.

ay ben look just like humans, but that is the artificial life and a machine will not have a ' soul-or will it? Maybe the ' artificial man will be able to produce human beings " " real flesh and blood who are genetically modified to develop a disease or infectious germs port may well be the machines become more intelligent human beings and we are governed by them. extreme thoughts maybe, but all that now seems unlikely, it is very possible in the future.

Now more than ever, people need to understand who they are and why they exist. If we spend life without having idea of who we truly are, we will get more and more lost in high-tech revolution. We need a solid base to build our lives on.

All life contains a ' soul, and even a clone will have a soul once the breath of life is infused into the body. We will never be able to know who was born and that is a clone. Spirit is in all her life and those who want to think human beings have an exclusive contract with spirit try anger and hatred towards a cloned human being, if they can distinguish one from a human created nature. Many people will say a clone has no soul, therefore, is not truly human.

Many people think they are superior to a dog or a cat. Many people believe animals do not have a ' soul. All this blind " " dogma was programmed in humans for thousands of years. This is why most people can't be happy. They must guard their possessions and many humans believe to possess God only, from all other species of life. Some fundamentalist fanatics also get to think the other humans who are not of their system of beliefs, are not in the field of God at all. Many different tribes entangled in limitations of thought aligned into divisions of the blind of ' I think and so much time wasted, worrying and hate others.

Oh! By the way, did I mention genetic engineering? I think I've done talk and said it was a possibility in the future. Well, I heard today may put genes in our foods to make us fit and well. Perhaps even to control our minds, when we feel like revolts against the clones?

Athletes are experimenting with all kinds of stuff to make them compete faster. A hundredth of a second can mean the difference of sponsorship money, and all athletes to be winners. L ' last thing I read was the juice from the WaSP larvae killer wasps gives a big boost. Some seek a menu of caterpillar fungus, seal penises and l ' extract of seahorse. How lip-smackingly exquisite!

With such competition in sports, it won't be long before the gene therapy is introduced and entered into the popular sport. We will be able to tailor-make our body. New stem cells of diseased cells. There is need of ' the surgeon's scalpel. Then we will re-production of a human being to satisfy a trend.

L ' habit of Flesh Eating

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Freemasonry: closeted mental illness?

Thousands belong. Hundreds of cities host it. But what is the secret surrounding the practice of Freemasonry, and is safe for our community?

Operating under the ' of " promotion " mutual assistance among its members, the society of free and accepted Masons is a fraternal organization, mostly composed of men from different walks of life. Accession criteria includes the belief in a supreme being, as well as " birth in freedom, or " outside of slavery.

Many other fraternal organizations such as Moose, Elks, Kiwanis, and have mounted a network of partner-driven chapters around the world, but none has generated criticism as that of Freemasonry. Multiple accidents involving deeply organization members to lead a singular question: Freemasonry is a haven for the mentally ill?

In this article, we'll explore the emotional win behind participation in Freemasonry, and incidents that have led to the perception of Freemasonry as a ' terrorist organization intended to obstruct the legal system.

Masonic Psychology

Freemasonry is a ritual-based, means that all activities, from meetings behind closed doors for new Member induction, is a performance of specific actions with the value assigned by its membership.

From the psychological point of view, individuals who feel compelled to participate in the ritual activity to affirm self-esteem so elitist. And ' for this reason that Freemasonry attracts people who lack a sense of unconditional acceptance into mainstream society, identifiable by the desire to be free and " " " " ' accepted all individuals in a private company " ".

A group of individuals seeking affirmation of the value of it is likely that parts of other related disorders, thus resulting in emotional, even if unintentionally, unhealthy behaviors or actions that are accepted by the group.

How do affirm self-worth. And ' for this reason that Freemasonry attracts people who lack a sense of unconditional acceptance into mainstream society, identifiable by the desire to be free and " " " " ' accepted all individuals in a private company " ".

A group of individuals seeking affirmation of the value of it is likely that parts of other related disorders, thus resulting in emotional, even if unintentionally, unhealthy behaviors or actions that are accepted by the group.

The ' interaction with peers outside the traditional work and family environment can be a rewarding way for enrichment, improving the quality of life while promoting l ' l ' unit and the fulfilment of community worth causes. Though masonry is marketed transmits this organizational construct, goals and objectives integrated into his later reflect an obscure minor reason: to ensure the welfare of its members through mutual assistance '. Provide a support network of mutual assistance for an emotionally deprived group of people looking for affirmation of the value can be the ' look of a typical fraternal organization, which apparently associated Freemasonry with a spectrum of harmful activities, including organised crime, paedophilia and murder.

Those who engage in criminal activity do so for a myriad of reasons. psychological satisfaction of an offence is generally defined by previous experiences or emotional state of the perpetrator. Although not all criminals are considered mentally ill, shows many psychological traits or characteristics which may give rise to a more favourable attitude to criminal behavior.

Compared to Freemasonry, as problems with self-esteem and the desire to feel " included " by individuals like all ' within a group of peers can generate and perpetuate an environment that accepts otherwise inappropriate behaviour traditionally. In trying to cure themselves through " " l ' interaction with like-minded people, the ' organization may actually be increasing the desire of the participants ' to engage in inappropriate behavior deemed acceptable by the group.

orthwhile community causes. Though masonry is marketed transmits this organizational construct, goals and objectives integrated into his later reflect an obscure minor reason: to ensure the welfare of its members through mutual assistance '. Provide a support network of mutual assistance for an emotionally deprived group of people looking for affirmation of the value can be the ' look of a typical fraternal organization, which apparently associated Freemasonry with a spectrum of harmful activities, including organised crime, paedophilia and murder.

Those who engage in criminal activity do so for a myriad of reasons. psychological satisfaction of an offence is generally defined by previous experiences or emotional state of the perpetrator. Although not all criminals are considered mentally ill, shows many psychological traits or characteristics which may give rise to a more favourable attitude to criminal behavior.

Compared to Freemasonry, as problems with self-esteem and the desire to feel " included " by individuals like all ' within a group of peers can generate and perpetuate an environment that accepts otherwise inappropriate behaviour traditionally. In trying to cure themselves through " " l ' interaction with like-minded people, the ' organization may actually be increasing the desire of the participants ' to engage in inappropriate behavior deemed acceptable by the group.

Controversy in Brotherhood

While Freemasonry has attracted many high-profile politicians, professionals and even police officers, the practices of real secret organization ' have led to controversy dating back in 1826 with the ' murder of Captain William Morgan. Shortly after writing a book exposing the practice of Freemasonry, Morgan was informed by his colleagues was to be killed by members of the ' organization. In the story of subsequent events, Morgan tried to escape by entering Canada, but was stopped at the border by the police, arrested for debt ', tried in absence, in jail, then released on bail and five members drowned in the Niagara River.

More recently, William James, a 47 year old father of five, was hit in the face during a ceremony of initiation Freemason in March 2004. According to police, James was attending an initiation rite intended to " create a State of anxiety " for the applicant, when 76 years ago Albert Eid, another Member participating in the ritual, shot James with a fully loaded 0.32-calibre firearm from the left pocket, instead of a 22-caliber weapon loaded to Hi in the right pocket.

Today, Freemasonry continues to play a controversial role in various conditions, as a result of indications that suggest the ' organization serves no greater purpose to act as a safe haven for criminals. Why Freemasons are sworn to protect their colleagues-even to the point of committing perjury, under oath--exposing alleged criminal activities committed by its participants is a difficult process.